Bloody Roar PSN

Final Words:1997 was a competitive and exciting time for fighting games. The arcade scene was insane. If you were at home playing Bloody Roar for any long period of time, I have to boldly say you were missing out on \"getting good\" at many other amazing 2D and 3D fighting games. That's my personal (biased if you will) take. It meantthat much to put time into those games... that I didn't give Bloody Roar much of a chance due to its technical (gameplay) limitations.But y'know, in retrospect... sure, the first Bloody Roar wasn't \"bad\". The art style of the first game was respectible. I give Bloody Roar some credit on its attempt to be innovative... but thecharacter designs just never appealed to me, sorry... (and I don't think I'm the only one).The gameplay also isn't even close to being what I consider \"solid\" or fun to play for any extended period of time (the main point of fighting games, in my opinion).Fighting games I was putting lots of time into in '97 (And I'm glad I did) For starters: TEKKEN 3, Soul Blade, X-Men VS SF, MSH VSStreet Fighter, Rival Schools, Umm... Street Fighter III: 2nd Impact, Street Fighter Alpha 2, Samurai Shodown 4, Mortal Kombat 4, and there are more... When you look at all the games that were out, you can see why it was difficult for Bloody roar to\"impress\" me. A gimmick like \"Beast Mode\" only goes so far... which is why I passed on Bloody Roar. To its credit, Bloody Roar did at least try something different from the usual fighting game formula. Maybe we'll get a new one somedayTFGWebmaster @Fighters_Gen 59ce067264

https://www.teamhq.com/forum/gaming-forum/buy-iphone-screen-replacement